Professor Sujit Choudhry’s Take on Disintegrating Democracy

Professor Sujit Choudhry is a scholar known globally, known for his opinions on the vast stance of constitutional law and politics. Professor Sujit Choudhry believes in his philosophy of inherent design, a tool he thinks can bridge the violent conflict and transition this violent conflict to peace democratic practices and politics. Professor Sujit Choudhry belives his philosophies can be carried and utilized in societies who are ethnically divided, reference (Facebook.com).

Professor Sujit Choudhry philosophy in constitutional law and politics, he believes can change the following sectors:

– Federalism

– Decentralization and Succession

– Constitutional Courts and Affected Transitional Justice

– Minority and Group Rights

– Bill of Rights

– Transitions From Authoritarian type government to Democratic Rule.

– Using the study of comparative constitutional law to central methodological questions.

– Using Constitutional Law in Canadian Government policies, a subject Professor Sujit Choudhry has written broadly on.

Professor Sujit Choudhry’s book chapter-Constitutional Democracies in Crisis?, visit (Instagram.com)

Professor Sujit Choudhry most recent publication, Constitutional Democracies in Crisis, is the professor breakdown of a tweet by Eric Holder, Attorney General under previous President Obama’s administration. Holder in his tweet states the suggested firing of White House-appointed Special Counsel Robert Mueller is an ÔÇťabsolute red line.” In Holder tweet, he suggests that if Muller position was terminated, peaceful demonstrations should ensue.

In Professor Sujit Choudhry’s publication, he stresses that Holder’s tweet is built on the foundation of “constitutional self-enforcement, build around the concept of a focal point.” Choudhry’s publication centers on the principle of appropriate behavior of a public official by centering on the focal point; Or as Choudhry’s has referred, the constitutional rule. As Sujit Choudhry has emphatically pointed out in his publication, violations of constitutional regulations do not require a court to label the action.

Going back to Poland’s capturing of the Constitutional Tribunal, Professor Choudhry refers this action as a form of democratic backsliding and uses this analogy with Eric Holder opinions in the Tweet he made here in the states, helpful source on medium.com. In Professor Choudhry conclusion of this analogy, he parallels Holder’s tweet and the actions Holder implied in the Tweet virtaully the same idea as Poland capturing of the Constitutional Tribunal. For further information, read Choudhry publication, Constitutional Democracies in Chris, click http://sujitchoudhry.com/about/.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *